Unconstitutional Content: Social media accounts representing the government should not post insensitive content

Before 2025, you’d have to travel to England to hear the words “Long Live the King.”

That’s because in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, it is explicitly stated that no one holding office in the United States can be granted a title of nobility. 

A President is not King. Period.

As this is directly stated in the Constitution, some surprise is warranted when the official, verified White House Instagram account posts a Time Magazine-cover-inspired illustration of a crown-adorned President Donald Trump with the message “Long Live the King” printed in the bottom left corner. Trump was pictured towering over the frame as the post applauded him for getting rid of “congestion pricing” in New York.

A social media account that represents the U.S. government shouldn’t be posting content outside of its political duties.

The White House account typically posts the latest policy initiatives from its administration, like a new executive order or an important bill that was passed. Trump’s administration has been following this pattern with their posts — with some appalling exceptions. 

Spliced in between clips of press conferences and diplomatically-posed handshakes, viewers of the White House Instagram account will also find a reel titled “ASMR: Illegal Alien Deportation Flight.” 

Whether a viewer is supportive of deportation or not, this moment shouldn’t be recorded and then reframed as a social media ASMR trend. ASMR is for slime videos, not deportation from the official White House account. It’s not funny, it’s just unprofessional, not to mention disrespectful.

America was built off of the core values of free speech and natural rights. Even so, the government itself shouldn’t be posting technically legal, unprofessional and possibly harmful content from its official accounts. A meme of Trump wearing a crown might be found in an exchange between X users — that’s fine — but it shouldn’t be posted by the White House account.

Just because Americans have the right to free speech doesn’t mean your boss can post a video on their professional Facebook titled “Get Ready With Me To Fire My Employee.”

A White House X post from March 5 boasts that Trump is “Undoing Biden’s Economic Damage,” arguing that “the actions he has taken are already paying off,” without citing a single quote from economist, statistic or even strategy. These posts feel more like an offhand comment made by Uncle Tim at Thanksgiving than a post from the government itself.

Our country’s leaders know that a large majority of teens and young adults find their news on social media because two extra clicks to read a whole article is too much.  

Not only are these posts unprofessional, they’re borderline propaganda; the posts use social media to spread beliefs in a way that goes beyond normal politics. 

The White House’s gross characterization of our country's leader as higher-than-law undermines democracy, ignoring that power is granted by the people. Now, the executive branch is testing the limits of its authority through executive orders — largely unchecked by other branches of government — like a monarch, which is being normalized through the White House’s various social media accounts.

One of the White House’s Instagram posts features a quote from Trump’s X account underneath his official portrait: “He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.” Actually, He who saves his Country can still violate any Law. A President who once had 88 separate felony charges against him should know this.

Eerily enough, President Trump’s quote, one often attributed to general Napoleon Bonaparte, mirrors one made by Adolf Hitler during his rule: “The authority of the Führer is not limited by laws or statutes.”

Hint: if a Donald Trump quote can be confused with an Adolf Hitler quote, maybe it’s not such a good idea to post it on an official government account. 

It’s extremely important to remember that Hitler’s rule began with posters depicting him as an unrealistically perfect leader. 

America’s government has built-in checks and balances to prevent a leader like Hitler from rising above the judgment of law and taking too much power. So an account from the same government posting a quote mirroring that of a dictator would have our founding fathers rolling over in their graves. 

Free speech might be a right of all social media users. Still, a government agency shouldn’t be taking advantage of its right to post content that’s at best insensitive and at worst blatantly wrong.

The White House social media accounts should only post informational content rather than using their influential platform for biased and ignorant content — and leave the ASMR to the influencers.

One response to “Unconstitutional Content: Social media accounts representing the government should not post insensitive content”

  1. Anonymous says:

    So firstly, Trump is a human. Whether you like his morals or ethics, he is human. And naturally us humans have a sense of humor. Humor can come in many ways such as sarcasm!! Clearly what President Trump's PR team did by posting that tweet was being sarcastic and mocking every other liberal who screams "KING!" yet can not back up any reason as to why he is a king. Secondly, the White House X account should post whatever the President wants to be posted--that of course fall into [said platform's] guidelines and rules. So if the President wants to send messages to the people, whether that's via Twitter or tv, he has that right. Also, say if the President unashamedly posted something very derogatory, you wouldn't want people to see who he truly is? You want people to stay dumb and stupid and keeping voting in this president even if this president is a true Nazi, White-Supremacist, Racist etc.--which those do not fit President Trump's description at all. Third, you say, "Moments like these [deportations and arrests] shouldn't be recorded." But they're recorded all the time. You can go down to your local police station and file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to receive parts of camera footage, body-cam footage, records, etc. Are you saying we should remove body cams from all cops since "moments like these shouldn't be recorded."? Also, people rebrand videos all the time. So what if the White House does it. I'd also like to point out: I found it extremely funny! And criminal, illegal aliens don't deserve respect. Sure they deserve basic rights and care like any criminal would. But if someone wants to record them and then use that video to refurbish it into something humorous, that's a-okay. And to not do that isn't something we owe to these illegal aliens. You're also wrong about the, "Just because Americans have the right to free speech doesn’t mean your boss can post a video on their professional Facebook titled 'Get Ready With Me To Fire My Employee.'" If that recording doesn't mention your name or spread lies your boss is very well within his legal rights to do such. Fourth, per the BLS inflation in June of 2021 was up by 5.4%, June 2025: 2.7%. So yea what he did say was factually correct. And if President Trump's comments were factually on the same level as Uncle Tim, then Mr. Tim is an honest and noble man that never spouts a lie. Its funny you talk about how "ASMR: Deportation" posts on social media is propaganda, but I would bet $100,000,000 that you will not call out Zohran Mamdani's TikToks propaganda. Because you've already been brainwashed. Orange man bad, Communist good! Fifth, that is just false. In no way has the Trump Administration pushed a narrative that President Trump is "higher-than-law." I will say that he was wrong in that quote. But I'm willing to call out my president. You will never call out any democrat in today's world. And quite frankly I don't care what he says when you turn around and compare him to Adolf Hitler. How dare. What kind of nazi goes with Ben Shapiro and a Rabbi to pay tribute to the killed yet innocent jews of October 7th. His actions have been no where near the actions of killing, enslaving, and torturing innocent Jews. And to think that I live in an America where we call people, we disagree with, Nazis and Hitler is disgusting. You should be ashamed.

Leave a Reply to AnonymousCancel reply

Author Spotlight

The 2025-26 editorial board consists of Sophia Brockmeier, Libby Marsh, Luciana Mendy, Francesca Lorusso, Lucy Stephens, Bella Broce, Sydney Eck, Michael Yi, Avni Bansal, Mya Smith, Grace Pei and Christopher Long. The Harbinger is a student run publication. Published editorials express the views of the Harbinger staff. Signed columns published in the Harbinger express the writer’s personal opinion. The content and opinions of the Harbinger do not represent the student body, faculty, administration or Shawnee Mission School District. The Harbinger will not share any unpublished content, but quotes material may be confirmed with the sources. The Harbinger encourages letters to the editors, but reserves the right to reject them for reasons including but not limited to lack of space, multiple letters of the same topic and personal attacks contained in the letter. The Harbinger will not edit content thought letters may be edited for clarity, length or mechanics. Letters should be sent to Room 400 or emailed to smeharbinger@gmail.com. »

Our Latest Issue