Accepting AI: Schools should embrace Chat GPT to enhance class and prepare students for careers in computer science

New tech just dropped! It can craft haikus, drop relationship advice and explain quantum mechanics in terms a 5-year-old would understand. Oh, and it’s free.

But for students? Hands off.

Chat GPT — Open AI’s new software and teachers’ worst nightmare — is already being used in offices to compile research and email clients. To prevent cheating, schools across the country are banning the chatbot from devices and WiFi networks, according to the New York Times. At East, it’s already blocked. 

So the entire workforce gets to “cheat” — but not us.

The point of high school is to prepare us for our future. If that future looks like employing Chat GPT to research data or advertise a product on social media, then let’s attack it the right way, making our relationship with artificial intelligence symbiotic — not dependent. By utilizing this software and emphasizing computer science in school, we can prepare for an inevitable tech-advanced society.

Francesca Stamati | The Harbinger Online

AI is rising in value and effectiveness in our personal and work lives. With programs that can generate unique art or write entire Hallmark movie scripts, it’s unavoidable. You can’t expect people to restrain themselves from using software that cuts to-do lists in half. 

That’s why we should embrace new innovations — not assume they’ll only have negative implications. Instead of banning Chat GPT in academics for fear of cheating, let’s train students to be technicians with the necessary skills for future careers. Exploring the inner workings of AI and actively using it in class will prepare us for the rising demand in computer science jobs and knowledge of technology as a work tool.

From 2021 to 2031, employment in jobs related to computer and information technology is expected to increase 14.6%, according to the U.S. Department of Labor. Since programs like Chat GPT will replace jobs and heighten the need for tech professionals, students should learn more about building, coding and programming computers in school. Maybe then we’d appreciate our MacBooks as more than devices to click “submit” on Canvas.

Aside from adding more computer science-based classes, we can utilize AI by incorporating it into classrooms to plan lessons more efficiently like any other tool. Calculators and Google Docs don’t erase our ability to add fractions and handwrite — they just expedite the smaller tasks so we can derive multivariable equations and craft thoughtful stories. 

For Chat GPT, this could look like using a chatbot-generated writing prompt to stimulate ideas for a creative story or forming personalized vocabulary lists. It can help teachers too, allowing them to devise lesson plans, rubrics and even letters of recommendation within seconds — saving time for more activity-based lessons.

That’s the beauty of new tech — it advances our learning. Students can use Chat GPT to generate lessons that cater to their learning style and reading level, freeing up time for interactive practice after a quick read of the online chatbot. For example, we could type in “explain artificial intelligence to a visual learner, using language a ninth grader could understand” and spend the rest of class testing software like Chat GPT.

Francesca Stamati | The Harbinger Online

Besides, banning the software won’t prevent students from accessing it through personal laptops and phones. Programs that detect AI-generated writing will also fall short when students learn to tweak a few words and dumb down their chatbot-written essays — teaching them only to be sneakier cheaters.

Instead, cheating should inspire a revamp of learning methods. Teachers could require students to submit the creative process behind their essay or assignment — such as early drafts or Google Docs document history indicating their changes.

As brainstorming and outlining promote creativity and individuality that a robot can’t fake, this approach will both prove academic integrity and emphasize drafting and organizing ideas. This process is more critical to learning than the final copy of an essay — a chatbot could generate that in seconds anyway.

By redirecting the software to streamline creative projects and a deeper understanding of technology, we can raise future coders and web developers — not master cheaters. Chat GPT is not the end of learning, and it’s not going to make us mind-numb zombies who can’t do anything ourselves — as long as we stop running away from technology and start collaborating with it.

Leave a Reply

Author Spotlight

The 2023-24 editorial board consists of Katie Murphy, Greyson Imm, Maggie Kissick, Aanya Bansal, Ada Lillie Worthington, Addie Moore, Emmerson Winfrey, Bridget Connelly and Veronica Mangine. The Harbinger is a student run publication. Published editorials express the views of the Harbinger staff. Signed columns published in the Harbinger express the writer’s personal opinion. The content and opinions of the Harbinger do not represent the student body, faculty, administration or Shawnee Mission School District. The Harbinger will not share any unpublished content, but quotes material may be confirmed with the sources. The Harbinger encourages letters to the editors, but reserves the right to reject them for reasons including but not limited to lack of space, multiple letters of the same topic and personal attacks contained in the letter. The Harbinger will not edit content thought letters may be edited for clarity, length or mechanics. Letters should be sent to Room 400 or emailed to smeharbinger@gmail.com. »

Francesca Stamati

Francesca Stamati
As Print Co-Editor-in-Chief, senior Francesca Stamati knows by now what to expect when walking into the J-room: cackle-laugh fits at inappropriate times, an eye-roll or two from Tate (who is secretly smirking) and impassioned debates with people who care way too much about fonts. But her experience doesn’t make 2 a.m. deadlines any less thrilling. In her last year on staff, Francesca has her eyes wide open to learn something new — whether it’s how to edit a story in less than an hour, or how many AP style jokes she can crack before Co-Editor Peyton Moore hits the ground. »

Our Latest Issue